The Verse Itself
The Panchakanya shloka, recited in many households as part of morning prayer, names five women, Ahalya, Draupadi, Tara, Sita and Mandodari, and states that remembering them daily destroys great sins. A widely circulated variant substitutes Kunti for Sita, and different regional and sectarian traditions have argued over the exact list for centuries without ever settling on a single canonical version, which is itself revealing about how the tradition actually uses this verse.
What is notable, and rarely discussed when the verse is simply recited by rote, is that none of these five women had conventional or uncomplicated lives by the standards the tradition otherwise applies to virtuous womanhood. Ahalya was cursed for infidelity, willing or deceived depending on the telling, an episode already treated elsewhere on this site. Draupadi had five husbands, an arrangement explained elsewhere in this series through her prior-life boon. Tara was married first to Vali and then, after his death, to his brother and killer Sugriva. Sita endured captivity in another man's kingdom and a second exile after her return. Mandodari was married to Ravana, a figure the tradition otherwise treats as irredeemably villainous, and by some later tellings remarried Vibhishana after Ravana's death.
What the List Is Actually Honouring
Modern commentators and several traditional interpreters read the Panchakanya verse as honouring not conventional chastity in the narrow sense but a different kind of steadfastness: each of these five women faced a life circumstance that placed her outside the ordinary expectations of her time, whether through no fault of her own or through a situation dharma itself is shown negotiating, and each is remembered for enduring it with dignity, intelligence and an unbroken inner resolve rather than for the circumstance itself.
Ahalya's endurance under an unjust curse, Draupadi's composure and sharp legal reasoning through repeated humiliation, Tara's political wisdom in advising both Vali and later Sugriva, Sita's steadfastness through captivity and subsequent trial, and Mandodari's documented attempts to warn her husband away from his own destruction despite his refusal to listen, are each read as forms of strength distinct from, and in the tradition's own eyes sometimes greater than, simple domestic virtue.
Read this way, the verse functions less as a checklist of ideal marriages and more as a quiet counter-tradition inside the same texts that elsewhere prescribe more conventional models, naming five women whose actual lives refused to fit the mould, and asking devotees to remember them specifically because of that, not in spite of it.
How the Verse Is Used Today
The shloka remains in active daily use, chanted during morning prayers, recited at the start of certain rituals, and taught to children as one of the shorter memorable verses in household religious education, valued partly for its brevity and partly for the promise of sin-removal attached to simply naming these five women with sincerity.
Its continued popularity, across regional and sectarian lines that disagree on almost everything else about how to read individual episodes involving these women, suggests the verse survives less because of theological precision and more because it offers something genuinely rare in devotional literature: five complicated, specific women, drawn from across the two great epics and named together not as warnings or cautionary tales but as figures whose remembrance is itself considered auspicious.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why does the verse sometimes name Kunti instead of Sita?+
Different manuscript and regional traditions preserve variant versions of the shloka, and no single text is universally treated as the sole original, so both Sita and Kunti appear as the fifth name depending on the source consulted.
Is Panchakanya an ancient Vedic concept?+
The specific verse and its formal grouping of these five names is generally understood as a later devotional composition rather than part of the earliest Vedic corpus, though each individual woman's story is drawn from the older Ramayana and Mahabharata traditions.
Does calling them Kanya, meaning maiden, make sense given some were married multiple times?+
Commentators generally read Kanya here in a symbolic rather than literal sense, referring to a quality of inner purity and inviolable dignity maintained through circumstance, rather than a literal claim about marital or physical status.
About the author
Anjali Mehta · Editor, M.A. Religious Studies
Anjali is the managing editor for Vandnaa and oversees the festival and vrat coverage. She holds an M.A. in Religious Studies and reviews every published article for accuracy, accessibility, and tradition-fidelity.
Meet the Vandnaa editorial team →