The Fan Service
Thirukkachi Nambi, in Sanskrit Kanchipurna, eleventh century, is one of the five acharyas of Ramanuja, and the least conventional of them.
His name: Thirukkachi is sacred Kanchi, and Nambi is a title of respect. The Sanskrit Kanchipurna means the one filled with Kanchi.
Where he was from: Poovirundavalli, now Poonamallee, near Chennai.
His community
He was not a brahmana, and this is not incidental to anything that follows.
The sources describe him as a vaishya, and some traditions place him lower. What is agreed is that he was outside the class permitted to study or teach the Sanskrit texts, and that his standing in the ritual order was well below Ramanuja's.
And he was older than Ramanuja, and was already an established figure at Kanchi when Ramanuja was a young man.
What he did
He fanned the deity.
Varadaraja Perumal at Kanchipuram, one of the great Vishnu temples of the south, and Nambi's service was the aalavatta seva, the waving of the fan before the deity.
Every day. He walked from Poovirundavalli to Kanchi, which is a substantial distance, performed the fan service, and went home.
And that was his practice. No texts, no commentaries, no school, no disciples in the formal sense. He fanned the deity, daily, for a very long time.
And Varadaraja spoke to him
This is the claim the tradition makes about him, without qualification.
The deity at Kanchi conversed with Thirukkachi Nambi, regularly, and the conversations were about ordinary things as well as important ones.
And the Srivaishnava tradition, which is otherwise the most systematically philosophical of the south Indian schools, records this flatly, and builds doctrine on the content of those conversations.
How to hold that
As the tradition's own account, reported as the tradition reports it.
And with the observation that a tradition of formidable Sanskrit intellectuals chose to say that its central doctrinal questions were settled by putting them to a non brahmana fan waver who talked to a statue.
Which is not an accident. It is the same argument as Periya Nambi and Maraneri Nambi, made a different way.
How Ramanuja came to him
Ramanuja was in Kanchi as a young man, studying under Yadava Prakasha, an Advaita teacher, and the accounts describe him increasingly disagreeing with his teacher's readings of the Upanishads.
And he had a service of his own at the Varadaraja temple: fetching water from the Saluvan well for the deity's bath.
Which is how they met, and Ramanuja attached himself to the older man.
And wanted him as his acharya.
Nambi refused. Not because he thought little of Ramanuja, but because he considered himself unqualified: a man of his community could not be the acharya of a brahmana, and he would not permit it.
Which is the disagreement that runs through the rest of this entry, and the tradition preserves both sides of it without resolving it.
The Six Sentences
The episode Thirukkachi Nambi is central to, doctrinally.
What happened
Ramanuja had six questions and no way to settle them.
He had broken with Yadava Prakasha, he had not yet reached Srirangam, Yamunacharya was dead, and the fundamental positions of the school he would eventually build were not yet fixed.
So he asked Nambi to put them to Varadaraja.
And the deity answered, and the answers are known in the tradition as the aaru vaarthai, the six sentences, and they are the seed of the whole system.
The six
One. I am the supreme reality.
Aham eva param tattvam. Against the Advaita position that the personal deity is a lower level of truth, the answer is that the personal deity is the highest, and the whole of Vishishtadvaita follows from that.
Two. The difference is real.
Darshanam bheda eva. The distinction between the individual self and the divine is genuine and does not dissolve. The self is not identical with the absolute, and liberation is not the discovery that it always was.
Which is the direct rejection of Advaita, stated in one line.
Three. Surrender is the means.
Upayeshu prapattih. Not knowledge as the primary means, not works, not meditation practised to a standard nobody can reach. Prapatti, surrender, is the way, and it is available to anybody.
Four. Remembering at the last moment is not required.
Antima smriti varjanam. This is the compassionate one and it matters more than it looks.
The Gita says that whatever one remembers at the moment of death determines what follows, and the resulting anxiety is enormous: a person who has practised for fifty years might lose everything if their last minutes are confused, drugged, unconscious or terrified.
The answer removes it. For one who has surrendered, the final moment is not a test. The dying do not have to perform.
Five. Liberation comes at the end of this body.
Dehavasane muktih. No further births are required, and the wait is not indefinite.
Six. Take Mahapurna as your acharya.
Purnam tu ashraya. Go to Periya Nambi, whose entry opens this batch.
Which is the answer that matters practically, and it is the reason the two men met at Madurantakam.
Why the six matter
They are the compressed form of the entire Srivaishnava position, and everything the school later built, the Sri Bhashya, the commentarial literature, the split between the northern and southern schools, is an expansion of or an argument about these six lines.
And they were delivered, in the tradition's own account, through a man who could not read the texts they contradict.
How this app treats the deity speaking
As the tradition's account, reported as such.
What is not in question is that Thirukkachi Nambi was regarded, in his own lifetime and by people of formidable learning, as somebody in whom this was happening, and that they organised a school around what he reported.
And the fourth sentence is worth keeping regardless of what you think about its transmission.
The dying do not have to perform. A person who has spent a life in practice does not lose it because their last hours were frightened or confused or unconscious.
That is a genuinely merciful doctrine, it is held by this tradition explicitly, and it is worth telling anybody sitting with a dying parent.
The Argument They Never Settled
This is the honest part of the entry and it does not have a happy ending.
What Ramanuja wanted
To eat Thirukkachi Nambi's leftovers.
Which requires explaining, because in a modern reading it sounds strange and in the ritual system of the period it was an enormous statement.
Eating another person's leftover food, uchchishta, was the sharpest possible marker of relative status. You ate the remnants of somebody above you. A disciple ate the acharya's, a wife the husband's, in the conventions of the time.
And you did not eat the remnants of somebody below you in the caste order. That was pollution, and it was serious.
Ramanuja wanted to eat Nambi's, deliberately, precisely because it would say publicly that Nambi was his acharya and above him.
What Nambi did
Refused.
Repeatedly and firmly. He would not permit it, on the grounds that he was of a lower community and Ramanuja was a brahmana, and that whatever their relationship was, it could not be expressed that way.
And the accounts describe Ramanuja arranging it by a trick: inviting Nambi to eat at his house and then contriving to consume what remained, and Nambi discovering it afterwards and being genuinely distressed.
Both men are behaving well here, which is what makes the episode difficult.
Ramanuja is trying to break a rule that should be broken.
Nambi is refusing to let another man take on pollution on his account, which is also a form of care, and which comes from a lifetime inside the system.
And the tradition preserves both positions without deciding between them.
The other incidents, which are worse
Ramanuja's household did not share his views, and the tradition records this too.
Rakshakambal, Ramanuja's wife, appears in the accounts in three episodes:
One. She insulted Periya Nambi's wife over water at a well, treating her as of lower standing.
Two. She purified the house after Thirukkachi Nambi had visited, washing where he had been, because of his community.
Three. She gave to a brahmana some food that Ramanuja had promised to somebody poor.
And the consequence, in the tradition's account, is that Ramanuja sent her to her parents' house and took sannyasa.
How to hold that
Several things at once, and none of them should be dropped.
One. The caste practice is being recorded, not concealed. The tradition's own hagiography says that the wife of its founder washed the floor after his teacher left. It did not have to say that.
Two. Ramanuja's response was to end the marriage. Which is what the record says, and which was a serious act.
Three. Rakshakambal is given no voice. She appears only as an obstacle, she is not quoted, and she is presented entirely through the failures ascribed to her. She was also a woman of her period doing what her upbringing had trained her to do, and the tradition, which is generous to many people, is not generous to her.
Four. And it did not fix anything. The Srivaishnava community continued to practise caste, at Srirangam and elsewhere, for the next nine hundred years, and the disputes about temple entry ran into the twentieth century and beyond.
What the record is for
The same as with Periya Nambi and Maraneri Nambi.
The tradition preserved, in its own foundational literature, that its founder took a non brahmana as one of his five teachers, tried to eat his leftovers to say so publicly, and ended his marriage over how his household treated him.
That is on the record permanently, and it is available.
And the honest closing observation is that Nambi himself would not accept the gesture, and that the person most committed to maintaining the rule in this story is the man the rule was used against.
Which is what these systems do to people, and it is worth understanding rather than being surprised by.
What to Take From Him
One. He had one practice and he did it every day.
No texts, no commentaries, no school, no formal disciples. He walked from Poonamallee to Kanchi, waved a fan in front of the deity, and walked home, for a very long time.
And a tradition of formidable Sanskrit philosophers put its central doctrinal questions to him.
Applied: the person with one practice done daily for thirty years is not behind the person who has read everything. The tradition is explicit about this and keeps saying it.
Two. The fourth sentence.
The dying do not have to perform.
The Gita's line about what one remembers at the moment of death produces enormous anxiety, because a person who has practised for fifty years might lose it all if their last hours are confused, medicated, unconscious or frightened.
The answer given at Kanchi removes it. For one who has surrendered, the final moment is not a test.
Tell that to anybody sitting with a dying parent, because it is the single most useful doctrinal statement in this entry.
Three. The six sentences are the whole system in six lines.
The personal deity is the highest reality; the difference between self and divine is real; surrender is the means; the last moment is not a test; liberation comes at the end of this body; and go to Mahapurna.
Everything Srivaishnavism later built is an expansion of, or an argument about, those.
Four. The argument about the leftovers.
Ramanuja wanted to eat Nambi's remnants because it would say publicly that a non brahmana was his acharya. Nambi refused, firmly and repeatedly, because he would not let another man take on pollution on his account.
Both were behaving well, which is why it is hard.
And the person most committed to enforcing the rule was the man the rule was used against, which is what these systems do to people and is worth understanding rather than being surprised by.
Five. What the household did.
Ramanuja's wife washed the house after his teacher visited, and Ramanuja ended the marriage and took sannyasa.
The tradition did not have to record that and it did. It also gives Rakshakambal no voice, presents her only through her failures, and is not generous to a woman doing what her upbringing had trained her to do.
And it fixed nothing. The community practised caste for another nine hundred years. The record's value is that it is on the record.
A daily practice from this entry:
- Om Namo Narayanaya
- One service, small, done daily, of the kind Nambi did: a lamp, a flower, a wiping of the shelf, a fan if you have one
- The fourth sentence, held on to: the last moment is not a test
- A visit to Varadaraja Perumal, Kanchipuram, if you are ever near
A closing thought
A man who was not allowed to read the scriptures walked several miles every day to wave a fan in front of an image, and went home, and did that for most of a lifetime.
And the most formidable philosophical mind of his century, who was permitted to read everything, came to him with the six questions his entire system would rest on, and asked him to pass them on.
And then spent years trying to eat his leftover food in public so that everybody would know who was teaching whom, and the older man would not let him.
The Short Version
Who: Thirukkachi Nambi, in Sanskrit Kanchipurna, eleventh century, one of the five acharyas of Ramanuja and the least conventional. He was from Poovirundavalli, now Poonamallee, near Chennai, and he was not a brahmana, the sources describing him as a vaishya and some traditions placing him lower. He was outside the class permitted to study or teach the Sanskrit texts, and he was older than Ramanuja and already established at Kanchi when Ramanuja was young.
His practice: the aalavatta seva, waving the fan before Varadaraja Perumal at Kanchipuram, walking there from Poonamallee daily. No texts, no commentaries, no school, no formal disciples. The tradition records that Varadaraja conversed with him regularly, and builds doctrine on those conversations.
The six sentences: Ramanuja, having broken with Yadava Prakasha and with Yamunacharya already dead, asked Nambi to put six questions to the deity. The answers, the aaru vaarthai, are the seed of the whole system. I am the supreme reality, against the Advaita position that the personal deity is a lower truth. The difference between self and divine is real and does not dissolve. Surrender, prapatti, is the means, and it is available to anybody. Remembering at the last moment is not required, which removes the anxiety the Gita's line about the moment of death produces. Liberation comes at the end of this body. And take Mahapurna, Periya Nambi, as your acharya, which is why the two men met at Madurantakam.
The argument about the leftovers: eating another person's remnants was the sharpest marker of relative status, since one ate the remnants of somebody above oneself. Ramanuja wanted to eat Nambi's precisely because it would say publicly that Nambi was his acharya. Nambi refused firmly and repeatedly on the grounds of his community, and would not let another man take on pollution on his account. Ramanuja arranged it by a trick and Nambi was genuinely distressed. Both were behaving well, which is what makes it difficult.
The household: the tradition records that Ramanuja's wife Rakshakambal insulted Periya Nambi's wife at a well, purified the house after Thirukkachi Nambi visited, and gave to a brahmana food Ramanuja had promised to somebody poor, and that Ramanuja sent her to her parents and took sannyasa. The tradition did not have to record this and did, but it gives her no voice and presents her only through her failures. And it fixed nothing: the community practised caste for another nine hundred years.
Quick Answers
Who was Thirukkachi Nambi?+
One of the five acharyas of Ramanuja, known in Sanskrit as Kanchipurna, of the eleventh century, from Poovirundavalli, now Poonamallee near Chennai. He was not a brahmana, the sources describing him as a vaishya and some traditions placing him lower, so he was outside the class permitted to study or teach the Sanskrit texts. His practice was the aalavatta seva, waving the fan before Varadaraja Perumal at Kanchipuram, which he walked to daily. He had no texts, no commentaries, no school and no formal disciples, and the tradition records that the deity conversed with him regularly.
What are the six sentences of Varadaraja?+
The aaru vaarthai, the answers Thirukkachi Nambi brought back when Ramanuja asked him to put six questions to the deity at Kanchi, and the seed of the whole Srivaishnava system. One, I am the supreme reality, against the Advaita position that the personal deity is a lower level of truth. Two, the difference between the individual self and the divine is real and does not dissolve. Three, surrender, prapatti, is the means, rather than knowledge or works or unattainable meditation. Four, remembering at the last moment is not required, which removes the anxiety produced by the Gita's line about the moment of death. Five, liberation comes at the end of this body. Six, take Mahapurna, that is Periya Nambi, as your acharya.
Do I have to remember God at the moment of death?+
The Srivaishnava answer, the fourth of the six sentences, is no. The Gita's line about what one remembers at the moment of death produces enormous anxiety, because it implies that a person who has practised for fifty years might lose everything if their last hours are confused, medicated, unconscious or frightened. The answer given at Kanchi removes it: for one who has surrendered, the final moment is not a test. The dying do not have to perform. This is a genuinely merciful doctrine, held by this tradition explicitly, and it is worth telling anybody sitting with a dying parent.
Why did Ramanuja want to eat Thirukkachi Nambi's leftovers?+
Because eating another person's remnants, uchchishta, was the sharpest possible marker of relative status: one ate the remnants of somebody above oneself, a disciple the acharya's, and one did not eat the remnants of somebody below in the caste order, which counted as pollution. Ramanuja wanted to eat Nambi's precisely because it would say publicly that a non brahmana was his acharya and above him. Nambi refused firmly and repeatedly, on the grounds that he was of a lower community, and would not let another man take on pollution on his account. The accounts describe Ramanuja arranging it by a trick, and Nambi discovering it afterwards and being genuinely distressed. Both men were behaving well, which is what makes the episode difficult, and the person most committed to enforcing the rule was the man the rule was used against.
What happened between Ramanuja and his wife?+
The tradition records three episodes involving Rakshakambal: she insulted Periya Nambi's wife over water at a well, treating her as of lower standing; she purified the house after Thirukkachi Nambi had visited, washing where he had been because of his community; and she gave to a brahmana some food Ramanuja had promised to somebody poor. The consequence, in the tradition's account, is that Ramanuja sent her to her parents' house and took sannyasa. Several things should be held at once: the tradition recorded its founder's household practising caste against his own teacher and did not have to; Ramanuja's response was to end the marriage; Rakshakambal is given no voice, appears only as an obstacle, and is presented entirely through her failures, though she was a woman of her period doing what her upbringing had trained her to do; and it fixed nothing, since the community practised caste for another nine hundred years.
Where is the Varadaraja Perumal temple?+
At Kanchipuram in Tamil Nadu, one of the great Vishnu temples of the south and one of the hundred and eight Divya Desams sung by the alvars. It is where Thirukkachi Nambi performed the aalavatta seva, the fan service, daily, walking there from Poovirundavalli, now Poonamallee near Chennai. Ramanuja himself had a service there as a young man, fetching water from the Saluvan well for the deity's bath, which is how the two men met while Ramanuja was studying under the Advaita teacher Yadava Prakasha and increasingly disagreeing with him.
About the author
Pandit Ravindra Sharma · Vedic Rituals & Bhakti, 22+ years
Pandit Ravindra is the Vandnaa editorial team's resident specialist on aarti, chalisa, and daily devotion. He has performed home and temple pujas across Varanasi and Delhi for over two decades and contributes the bhakti-focused articles on this site.
Meet the Vandnaa editorial team →
