Madurai, July 1896
Ramana Maharshi, born Venkataraman Iyer on 30 December 1879 at Tiruchuzhi in the Madurai country of Tamil Nadu, and died on 14 April 1950 at Tiruvannamalai.
Before it happened
Nothing.
And this is the striking part. His father Sundaram Iyer was a pleader, a small town lawyer, and the household was ordinary and comfortable and religious in the way most households were.
Venkataraman was an unremarkable schoolboy. He was not studious, he was good at games, he had an exceptional memory and used it to get through lessons without working, and he slept very heavily. He had no practice, no teacher, no interest in philosophy and no reputation for anything.
His father died when he was twelve and the family moved in with an uncle at Madurai.
What happened
In July 1896, aged sixteen, alone in a room upstairs, he was seized by a sudden and overwhelming certainty that he was about to die.
He was not ill. Nothing had happened. The fear arrived without cause and it was total.
And what he did with it is the whole of his life.
He did not call anybody. He lay down on the floor, held his limbs rigid, held his breath, and deliberately went through it: the body is dying. Now it is dead. It will be carried out and burned. And then what.
And the question he asked in that state was: does that mean I am dead?
What he concluded
That the body was the thing dying and that he was not it.
Not as a reasoned position but as something he found by looking, in a room, in a few minutes, at sixteen, with no preparation.
And it did not wear off.
The accounts of the following weeks describe somebody who could no longer take his previous life seriously: he stopped caring about school, stopped responding normally to the household, sat for long periods, and could not explain himself to anybody.
Six weeks later he left.
On 29 August 1896 he took a small sum of money, wrote a note, and went, and the note is worth quoting in substance: he said he had set out in search of his father and in obedience to his command, that no one need grieve, and that no money need be spent looking for him.
He was on a train the next day and he never went home.
On the fear itself, which needs a plain note
A sudden overwhelming conviction that you are about to die, arriving without cause, with the body reacting as though it were true, is the standard description of a panic attack.
It is extremely common, it is frightening, it feels like a medical emergency and is not one, and it is treatable.
For Venkataraman it became a doorway. For almost everybody it is a panic attack, and the honest thing to say on a devotional site is both of those at once.
So if this is happening to you or somebody in your house: it is a recognised condition, it responds well to treatment, and you should see a doctor rather than wait for it to mean something. Tele MANAS 14416, free, all hours. A government hospital psychiatry department costs little or nothing.
And if there is chest pain, breathlessness that will not settle, or any doubt at all, treat it as cardiac until a doctor says otherwise. Ambulance 108.
Nothing in this article asks anybody to sit with terror to see what it produces.
The Hill
He went to Arunachala, and he never left it.
Why that place
Because he had heard the name as a small boy and it had stayed with him.
The accounts describe him hearing an older relative mention Arunachalam and being struck by it long before he had any idea what it was, and when the moment came he did not consider anywhere else.
He arrived on 1 September 1896 and remained for fifty four years.
The first years
Difficult, and the accounts are not sentimental about it.
He sat in the Patala Lingam, an underground vault in the Arunachaleswarar temple, absorbed for long periods and not attending to his body. Insects and vermin fed on him. He was found with sores. People began carrying him out and feeding him, because he was not feeding himself.
Later he moved up the hill: Gurumurtam, then the mango orchard, then Virupaksha Cave, then Skandashram.
He did not speak for years, not from a vow but because he had nothing he wanted to say.
The name
He was called Brahmana Swami at first, and in 1907 the scholar Ganapati Muni came to him, questioned him, and afterwards gave him the name by which he is known: Bhagavan Sri Ramana Maharshi.
His mother
She came looking for him, more than once, and asked him to come home.
He refused, and the accounts of those meetings are hard: he would not speak to her, and on one occasion wrote a note instead, saying that what is to happen will happen and what is not to happen will not, and that the best thing is to be silent.
And then, years later, she came and stayed.
She lived at Skandashram, took to the discipline, cooked, and became a renunciant. She died in 1922, and he was with her at the end, and he said afterwards that she had been liberated.
Her samadhi is at the foot of the hill, and Sri Ramanasramam grew up around it because he came down to it and did not go back up.
Which is a detail worth keeping. The ashram exists because of his mother's grave.
Arunachala itself
And this is the part that surprises people who arrive expecting a pure non dualist.
Ramana was devotionally attached to a hill.
He held that Arunachala is Shiva, not a place associated with Shiva but the thing itself in the form of a hill, and he wrote about it in language that has nothing dry in it.
The Five Hymns to Arunachala are his, and the longest, the Akshara Mana Malai, the marital garland of letters, is a love poem: pleading, reproachful, jealous, embarrassing in the way real devotion is embarrassing.
So a reader who has been told that Ramana taught only self enquiry has been told half of it. He taught enquiry and surrender as two roads, said repeatedly that either would do, and personally sang to a mountain for fifty four years.
His death
A sarcoma on his left arm, diagnosed in 1948. Four operations. It recurred each time. He refused to let the treatment become elaborate and continued to see visitors until nearly the end.
When devotees begged him not to leave them, the reply that is recorded is: where would I go? I am here.
He died on the evening of 14 April 1950.
Who Am I, Plainly
The teaching is short, and the shortness is the point, and it is usually made complicated by people explaining it.
The method
Atma vichara, self enquiry.
What you actually do
Notice a thought. Any thought.
Ask: to whom did this thought occur?
The answer will be: to me.
Then ask: who is that?
And instead of answering with a description, turn attention toward whatever the I refers to, and hold it there.
That is the whole instruction.
What it is not
It is not a mantra. You are not repeating who am I as a phrase. The question is a direction, not a sound.
It is not an intellectual exercise. You are not producing a list of what you are not. Ramana's texts do use the neti neti move, that I am not the body, not the breath, not the mind, but he treats it as a preliminary clearing rather than as the practice.
It is not answerable in words, and a verbal answer means you have gone back to thinking about the question instead of looking.
What he said happens
That the I thought, pursued, does not survive the pursuit. It arises, it is looked at, and it does not have a source that can be found where you expected one, and what is left is not a blank but the thing that was always there underneath the traffic.
The alternative he gave equal weight
Surrender.
And he was explicit that it is not a lesser road. If enquiry does not suit you, hand it over. Give the problem, the outcome and yourself to God and stop negotiating.
His formulation of why the two are the same: enquiry removes the one who has the problem, and surrender gives that one away. Either way the same thing goes.
Which means Ramana is available to a devotional reader who has no interest in advaita at all, and his own Arunachala hymns are the evidence.
What to read
- Nan Yar, Who am I, which is a few pages and contains the method
- Upadesa Saram, thirty verses
- Ulladu Narpadu, Forty Verses on Reality, which is dense
- The Five Hymns to Arunachala, for the other half of him
- Talks with Sri Ramana Maharshi and Day by Day with Bhagavan, records of conversations, which is where most people actually start
A caution about intensity
Worth stating because this practice is now taught at retreats.
Sustained, intensive attention to the sense of self can be destabilising for some people. Depersonalisation, derealisation and a frightening loss of the ordinary sense of being somebody are documented outcomes of intensive contemplative practice in a minority of practitioners, and long silent retreats are the setting where they usually appear.
If you have a history of psychosis, severe dissociation, bipolar disorder or an unstable period of any kind, talk to a doctor before doing an intensive retreat, and choose a teacher who will notice and will tell you to stop.
Fifteen minutes a day is not the risk. Ten silent days without sleep and without food is a different thing, and the tradition's own instruction is that a householder should practise in the middle of an ordinary life, which is what Ramana told most of the people who asked him whether to renounce.
He almost always told them not to.
Going to Tiruvannamalai

The place
Tiruvannamalai, in Tamil Nadu, about three and a half hours from Chennai, with the hill Arunachala on one side of the town and the enormous Arunachaleswarar temple at its foot.
What to see
- Sri Ramanasramam, at the foot of the hill, open daily, free, with his samadhi and his mother's, and the old hall where he sat
- Virupaksha Cave and Skandashram, up the hill from the ashram, a walk of thirty to sixty minutes depending on your legs
- Arunachaleswarar temple, one of the largest temple complexes in India and the Agni element temple among the Pancha Bhuta Sthalams
- The Patala Lingam within the temple, where he sat in the first months
Giri pradakshina
Walking around the hill, and Ramana recommended it constantly.
It is about fourteen kilometres, on a road, all the way around, with eight lingams marking the directions along the route.
When to do it: at night, and specifically on or near full moon, which is when it is traditionally done and when tens of thousands of people are doing it with you. Start after dark, finish before the heat.
Practical points
- Barefoot is traditional and optional. The road surface is hot in the day, is gritty at night, and cuts are common. If you have diabetes, do not walk barefoot at all: a foot injury you cannot feel is how people lose toes
- Carry water. Fourteen kilometres in Tamil Nadu is a real walk even at night
- On full moon the crowd is very large. Keep children physically held, agree a meeting point, and do not rely on phone signal
- Toilets and stalls exist along the route but the standard varies
Karthigai Deepam
The great festival, in November or December, when a beacon is lit on the summit of Arunachala and burns for days, visible for many kilometres.
It is one of the largest gatherings in Tamil Nadu. Accommodation must be booked long ahead, the town is completely full, and the crowd around the temple is intense.
Climbing to the summit
Possible, and take it seriously.
- Start before dawn. The hill is unshaded and Tamil Nadu is hot
- Do not go alone, and tell somebody your plan
- There are snakes. Watch where you put your hands and feet, wear shoes for the climb whatever you do on the pradakshina road
- Take more water than you think, and turn back if you are struggling
- Some of the hill is restricted at certain times, particularly around Deepam, and the restrictions exist because people have been hurt
On the ashram
Sri Ramanasramam does not charge for darshan, does not sell initiation, and feeds people.
Which is worth saying explicitly after the previous batch: this is one of the places where the ordinary cautions about payment, escalation and exclusive access do not apply, and the reason is that Ramana refused to build anything that could.
He owned nothing, took nothing, ate what everybody ate, and would not accept a separate arrangement for himself.
One honest note about the ashram in his time
Some traditional caste practices persisted in dining arrangements at the ashram during his lifetime, and Ramana did not systematically confront them, though he insisted that everybody who came was fed and treated visitors of every background alike in his own conduct.
Scholars have discussed this and it is not hidden, and a reader who wants a figure who dismantled caste will find Bhaktisiddhanta in the previous entry and Narayana Guru and others elsewhere, and will not find that here.
Ramana's method was not confrontation. It has advantages and this is its cost, and the entry records both.
A daily practice from this entry
- Arunachala Shiva, which is what people sing walking round the hill
- Once a day, on any thought that is bothering you: to whom has this come
- And Ramana's own answer to almost everybody who asked whether to give up their life and come and sit with him, which was no, stay where you are and do it there
The Short Version
Who: Ramana Maharshi, born Venkataraman Iyer on 30 December 1879 at Tiruchuzhi in the Madurai country of Tamil Nadu, died 14 April 1950 at Tiruvannamalai. His father Sundaram Iyer was a small town pleader and the household was ordinary. Venkataraman was an unremarkable schoolboy, not studious, good at games, with an exceptional memory he used to avoid working, and he had no practice, no teacher, no interest in philosophy and no reputation for anything. His father died when he was twelve and the family moved to an uncle's house in Madurai.
July 1896: aged sixteen, alone upstairs, he was seized by a sudden overwhelming certainty that he was about to die, with no illness and no cause. He called nobody. He lay down, held his limbs rigid, held his breath, and deliberately went through it, and asked in that state whether the death of the body meant he was dead. He concluded that the body was the thing dying and that he was not it, not as a reasoned position but as something found by looking, in a few minutes, at sixteen, with no preparation. It did not wear off. Six weeks later, on 29 August 1896, he took a little money, left a note saying he had set out in search of his father and in obedience to his command and that no one should grieve or spend money looking for him, and never went home.
On the fear: a sudden overwhelming conviction that you are about to die, arriving without cause with the body reacting as though it were true, is the standard description of a panic attack, which is extremely common, feels like a medical emergency and is not one, and is treatable. For Venkataraman it became a doorway; for almost everybody it is a panic attack, and both are true. Tele MANAS 14416, or any government hospital psychiatry department. With chest pain, unsettling breathlessness or any doubt, treat it as cardiac until a doctor says otherwise: ambulance 108.
The hill: he went to Arunachala because he had heard the name as a small boy and it had stayed with him, arrived on 1 September 1896 and stayed fifty four years. The first years were hard: he sat absorbed in the Patala Lingam vault of the Arunachaleswarar temple without attending to his body, vermin fed on him, and people carried him out and fed him. He moved to Gurumurtam, then Virupaksha Cave, then Skandashram, and did not speak for years, not from a vow but because he had nothing he wanted to say. Ganapati Muni gave him his name in 1907. His mother came looking for him more than once and he refused to go home, then years later she came and stayed, took the discipline, and died in 1922, and Sri Ramanasramam grew around her samadhi because he came down to it and did not go back up.
Arunachala: he held that the hill is Shiva, not a place associated with Shiva but the thing itself, and wrote the Five Hymns to Arunachala, the longest of which, the Akshara Mana Malai, is a love poem that is pleading, reproachful and jealous. A reader told that Ramana taught only self enquiry has been told half of it: he taught enquiry and surrender as two equally valid roads, and personally sang to a mountain for fifty four years.
The method: notice a thought, ask to whom it occurred, the answer is to me, then ask who that is, and instead of answering with a description turn attention toward whatever the I refers to and hold it there. It is not a mantra, not an intellectual exercise and not answerable in words. The alternative he gave equal weight was surrender: enquiry removes the one who has the problem and surrender gives that one away, so either way the same thing goes. Read Nan Yar, Upadesa Saram, Ulladu Narpadu, the Five Hymns, and Talks with Sri Ramana Maharshi.
A caution: sustained intensive attention to the sense of self can be destabilising for a minority, with depersonalisation and derealisation documented outcomes of intensive contemplative practice, usually appearing in long silent retreats. With any history of psychosis, severe dissociation, bipolar disorder or an unstable period, talk to a doctor first and choose a teacher who will tell you to stop. Fifteen minutes a day is not the risk. Ramana himself told almost everybody who asked whether to renounce not to.
Visiting: Tiruvannamalai is about three and a half hours from Chennai. See Sri Ramanasramam, which is free and does not sell anything, Virupaksha Cave and Skandashram up the hill, and the Arunachaleswarar temple, the Agni element temple among the Pancha Bhuta Sthalams. Giri pradakshina is fourteen kilometres around the hill, traditionally at night and on full moon: barefoot is optional and should be avoided entirely by anybody with diabetes, carry water, hold children physically in the crowd. Karthigai Deepam in November or December lights a beacon on the summit and fills the town completely. If climbing, start before dawn, do not go alone, wear shoes because there are snakes, and turn back if you are struggling.
Reader Questions Answered
Who was Ramana Maharshi?+
Born Venkataraman Iyer on 30 December 1879 at Tiruchuzhi in Tamil Nadu, he was an unremarkable schoolboy with no practice, no teacher and no interest in philosophy until, at sixteen in July 1896, he was seized by a sudden overwhelming certainty that he was about to die. He lay down and went through the experience deliberately, concluded that the body was the thing dying and that he was not it, left home six weeks later, went to Arunachala at Tiruvannamalai and stayed there for fifty four years until his death on 14 April 1950. His teaching is atma vichara or self enquiry, tracing the sense of I to its source, with surrender given equal weight as an alternative road.
How do I practise self enquiry?+
Notice a thought, any thought. Ask to whom it occurred. The answer will be to me. Then ask who that is, and instead of answering with a description, turn attention toward whatever the I refers to and hold it there. That is the whole instruction. It is not a mantra, so you are not repeating who am I as a phrase, since the question is a direction rather than a sound. It is not an intellectual exercise producing a list of what you are not, though Ramana does use neti neti as a preliminary clearing. And it is not answerable in words, so a verbal answer means you have gone back to thinking about the question instead of looking. He said the I thought, pursued, does not survive the pursuit, and that what is left is not a blank but what was always there underneath.
Was Ramana Maharshi's death experience a panic attack?+
A sudden overwhelming conviction that you are about to die, arriving without cause, with the body reacting as though it were true, is the standard description of a panic attack, which is extremely common, frightening, feels like a medical emergency without being one, and is treatable. For Venkataraman it became a doorway. For almost everybody it is a panic attack, and an honest devotional article says both at once. If it is happening to you or somebody in your house, it is a recognised condition that responds well to treatment, and you should see a doctor rather than wait for it to mean something: Tele MANAS 14416 is free at all hours, and any government hospital psychiatry department costs little or nothing. If there is chest pain, breathlessness that will not settle, or any doubt at all, treat it as cardiac until a doctor says otherwise, ambulance 108. Nothing about Ramana's life asks anybody to sit with terror to see what it produces.
Was Ramana Maharshi devotional or only a non dualist?+
Both, and a reader told he taught only self enquiry has been told half of it. He held that Arunachala is Shiva, not a place associated with Shiva but the thing itself in the form of a hill, and wrote the Five Hymns to Arunachala, the longest of which, the Akshara Mana Malai or marital garland of letters, is a love poem: pleading, reproachful, jealous, embarrassing in the way real devotion is embarrassing. He also gave surrender equal weight with enquiry as a road, saying repeatedly that either would do, on the reasoning that enquiry removes the one who has the problem while surrender gives that one away, so the same thing goes either way. He personally sang to a mountain for fifty four years, which makes him fully available to a devotional reader with no interest in advaita at all.
What is giri pradakshina at Arunachala?+
Walking all the way around the hill, which Ramana recommended constantly. It is about fourteen kilometres on a road, with eight lingams marking the directions along the route. It is traditionally done at night and especially on or near full moon, when tens of thousands of people are doing it with you, so start after dark and finish before the heat. Practical points: barefoot is traditional and optional, the road is hot in the day and gritty at night and cuts are common, and anybody with diabetes should not walk barefoot at all since a foot injury you cannot feel is how people lose toes. Carry water, because fourteen kilometres in Tamil Nadu is a real walk even at night. On full moon the crowd is very large, so hold children physically, agree a meeting point and do not rely on phone signal.
Is intensive self enquiry practice safe?+
For most people at ordinary intensity, yes, and fifteen minutes a day is not the risk. But sustained intensive attention to the sense of self can be destabilising for a minority: depersonalisation, derealisation and a frightening loss of the ordinary sense of being somebody are documented outcomes of intensive contemplative practice, and long silent retreats are the setting where they usually appear. If you have a history of psychosis, severe dissociation, bipolar disorder or an unstable period of any kind, talk to a doctor before doing an intensive retreat, and choose a teacher who will notice and will tell you to stop. It is worth knowing that Ramana himself told almost everybody who asked whether to give up their life and come and sit with him not to, and instructed householders to practise in the middle of an ordinary life.
About the author
Pandit Ravindra Sharma · Vedic Rituals & Bhakti, 22+ years
Pandit Ravindra is the Vandnaa editorial team's resident specialist on aarti, chalisa, and daily devotion. He has performed home and temple pujas across Varanasi and Delhi for over two decades and contributes the bhakti-focused articles on this site.
Meet the Vandnaa editorial team →


