Another Challenge Ravana Expected to Win
Before his eventual conflict with Rama, Ravana, seeking to test and expand his reputation for invincibility across the world's kingdoms, travelled to Kishkindha to challenge Vali, the vanara king covered elsewhere in this series for his own eventual death at Rama's hands, having heard of his exceptional strength and boon-granted invulnerability.
Arriving at Kishkindha, Ravana found Vali occupied in his morning ritual observance, Sandhya Vandana, the prayers traditionally performed at sunrise facing the sun, and rather than waiting for Vali to conclude this devotional routine before addressing the challenge, or being asked to wait himself, events unfolded in a way that immediately demonstrated the power gap between them.
Tucked Under an Arm Without Interrupting a Single Prayer
Vali, without pausing his prayers or treating the demon king's presence as worthy of setting aside his own daily discipline, simply reached out, seized Ravana, and tucked him securely under one arm, continuing his devotional circuit as though nothing unusual had occurred, according to most tellings flying with him held in this position across the four oceans as part of his usual sunrise ritual practice before finally setting him down once the prayers were complete.
Ravana, unable to break free of Vali's grip throughout this entire journey despite his own considerable strength, experienced the encounter as a profound and specific humiliation, made worse by the casual, almost incidental manner in which Vali treated him, not as a genuine threat requiring focused combat but as a minor inconvenience to be carried along while more important business, morning prayer, continued uninterrupted.
Alliance Instead of Continued Enmity
Rather than pursuing continued conflict after this humiliating defeat, Ravana, recognising Vali's overwhelming superiority, chose to make peace and form a friendship with him instead, an alliance the tradition presents as pragmatic on Ravana's part given the impossibility of defeating Vali by force.
This episode, alongside Kartavirya Arjuna's own earlier capture and caging of Ravana covered elsewhere in this series, establishes a consistent pattern across Ramayana-adjacent tradition: Ravana's boon of invulnerability specifically excluded humans and, in Vali's case, vanaras, since he had not considered them significant enough threats to include in his original request to Brahma, an omission this series has traced as the structural vulnerability that both these earlier humiliations and his eventual death at Rama's hands all exploit in different ways, each encounter quietly establishing well before the Ramayana's main events that Ravana's reputation for invincibility was always narrower than it appeared.
Common Questions From Devotees
How is this episode different from Kartavirya Arjuna's capture of Ravana?+
They are two separate incidents involving two different figures humbling Ravana in different ways, one a human king caging him and requiring a grandfather's plea for release, the other a vanara king casually carrying him along during routine prayer before releasing him voluntarily.
Did this alliance between Vali and Ravana ever benefit either of them practically?+
The text does not describe extensive joint action resulting from this friendship, and it remains largely a background detail establishing mutual non-aggression rather than an active alliance that shapes later events significantly.
Why did Ravana's original boon not protect him from vanaras specifically?+
As covered elsewhere in this series regarding his penance to Brahma, Ravana requested protection specifically from gods, gandharvas, yakshas and rakshasas, considering humans and vanaras too insignificant to bother naming, an omission that proves decisive both here and in his eventual death.
About the author
Anjali Mehta · Editor, M.A. Religious Studies
Anjali is the managing editor for Vandnaa and oversees the festival and vrat coverage. She holds an M.A. in Religious Studies and reviews every published article for accuracy, accessibility, and tradition-fidelity.
Meet the Vandnaa editorial team →